For over a hundred years, the link between apes and man, popularly known as the “missing link”, has been the subject of research among the best scientists of the human race. The discovery of “one unique” evidence placed Britain to be a contender as the cradle of humanity.
This discovery was for decades trusted by respected evolutionists as a concrete evidence to prove that their theory of evolution is a fact until another discovery was made public and was tagged as one of the worst crime of the 20th century. The link of England to antiquity, and its contention for being a cradle of human kind, and the link between humans and apes was cut by the alleged link turned scissors.
.
Eoanthropus dawsoni was the scientific name of this alleged missing link, and it would have been an extremely early example of a creature showing both human and apelike qualities. At 375,000 years old, it put England in contention for a cradle of humankind, being found in the Sussex town of Piltdown. The “first Englishman” he was proudly called when the anthropologist Charles Dawson found him in 1911. For decades, Piltdown Man was cited along with Neanderthal man and Heidelberg man as an example of early hominid life in Europe. Then in 1953, the fragments, including a jawbone, were tested: they did not contain enough fluorine to be the age that Dawson claimed; worse, the jawbone was that of a 10-year-old orangutan, its teeth ground down to simulate age, and a crude chemical wash applied to the bone to make it appear ancient. No one knows who perpetrated the hoax: Dawson had died in 1916. Very quickly, however, Piltdown became a synonym for phony; and England’s claim to antiquity was cut short by several hundred thousand years.
The link between the numbers 1 and 3 is 2 or sometimes may include its fraction like 1½ and 2½. The link of a child to its parents can be numbered! 23 pairs of chromosomes from the father and 23 pairs from the mother.
The allegations of evolutionists that complex forms of life came from the most simple single-celled plants and animals have no scientific evidence! Protozoa and amoeba are up to now protozoa and amoeba, still single-celled! We cannot find any living creature which is one and a half, two, and two and a half celled plants and animals. The only scientific link of protozoa and amoeba to more complex organisms is their parasitic characteristics.
Protozoa have known simple arithmetic for its existence by not clinging to a one and a half and a two and a half organism but unto multi-cellular ones. Maybe they have searched for such but found none.
Protozoa and amoeba which existed billions of years ago have managed to exist until now as protozoa and amoeba. Protozoa will always be protozoa and amoeba will always be amoeba.
Ecclesiastes 3:14
I know that, whatsoever God doeth, it shall be forever: nothing can be put to it, nor any thing taken from it: and God doeth it, that men should fear before him.
Protozoa exists as a single-celled creature, and have existed billions of years ago, but no single human cell can exist for a day independent of other cells in the tissues of a human body. If protozoan and amoeba have evolved into multi-cellular organisms due to natural selection and the principle of “survival of the fittest and the elimination of the unfit”, why cannot our human cells product of such evolution, exist independently like protozoan?
The fact is protozoan are protozoan and humans are humans!
To prove evolution really happened there must be a link! But what is the “missing link”? The link that evolutionists must explain scientifically beyond the shadow of a doubt. This link must not be the link being sought for by most evolutionists. The link between man and apes must not be the intelligent priority! The link must start from the origin of life. How can inorganic matters like soil and water evolve into an amoeba or protozoa?
Let evolutionists answer this!
esoriano 
Very well said, Bro.Eli 🙂
ang ganda ng tanong ni Bro.eli.
How can inorganic matters like soil and water evolve into an amoeba or protozoa?
Im sure di po masasagot ng mga evolutionist.
I’m not understanding why we keep separating God from evolution.. when everything was mad by God, and since it took millions of years (not 6 days).. God mad a living man out of the soil. He can surely make an amoeba or protozoan also appear. Know one can even imagine the thoughts of our God. So why argue over it.
Isaiah 55:8 For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the LORD.
We are talking about theory of evolution of darwins. It haven’t been proven and they even faked it to mislead peoples mind about the truth. Missing link is not missing, it doesn’t exist that is why no one can find the link. And that is the power of God. If something was not made by God it will not exist.
I thank God for your explanation, Bro. Eli. Your comparison between protozoans and humans is very enlightening. I just don’t know why most schools are still teaching the theory of evolution.
Most schools are teaching the theory of evolution because the curriculum therein is formulated by somebody or group of individuals who know not God. Had they understood in the first place the mystery behind the days of creation as outlined in the Bible, they would have second thoughts on including the topic in the school discussions. One thing is for sure, inasmuch as the theory of evolution is a lie, Satan must be pushing for the inclusion of this subject matter in the school curriculum so much so that the children would have first impression of his lie before they even hear of the truth in the Bible. Better still we have La Verdad College.
Link from the dust? 🙂
Genesis 2:7
then the LORD God formed the man of dust from the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living creature.
I agree. To God be the Glory!
Ich kann nur sagen prima gesagt , danke Bruder Eli ….
While browsing the philwebawards, I saw this site. I just wanna cite the fallacies made by the author who has no background in science.
-> Why soriano quotes the 1912 fake ape men if that is not the position of the scientific community today?
This is pure strawman fallacy
-> Quote “How can inorganic matters like soil and water evolve into an amoeba or protozoa?”
LOL. let me ask you soriano, how yahweh made man from dust of the ground?
-> “To prove evolution really happened there must be a link! But what is the “missing link”?”
– To prove yahweh exist there must be an evidence! But what is the evidence?
why soriano’s god is true and not the god of other religion? what is the evidence of the god of soriano?
why not allah? why not the god of iglesia ni cristo? why not YHW the god of the midianites? why YHWH of soriano?
-> “why cannot our human cells product of such evolution, exist independently like protozoan?”
It’s because of the evolution of its genome.
-> “The link between man and apes must not be the intelligent priority! The link must start from the origin of life. How can inorganic matters like soil and water evolve into an amoeba or protozoa?”
” soil and water evolve into an amoeba or protozoa”
You don’t use the word “EVOLVE” here. No reputable scientists even creationists will use such word “EVOLVE” from inorganic to organic
Anyway, read about abiogenesis. That’s the attempt of science to explain such development.
Why the YHWH of the bible created adam 6,000 years ago while the earth is already 4.5 Billions years old?
“Why the YHWH of the bible created adam 6,000 years ago while the earth is already 4.5 Billions years old?”
You are barking up the wrong tree…! The allegedly age of the earth and universe about 6000 years old were from the Jehovah’s Witnesses and those of the Seventh Day Adventist Church belief and not from the bible nor from us(MCGI). Follow this link: https://esoriano.wordpress.com/2010/11/04/the-antiquity-of-the-earth-biblical-or-scientific/
to russel lim,
do you think you are intelligent enough to disprove bro. eli? LOL
you are talking of nonsense and ignorance..
let me show you of your ignorance, you said “why the YHWH of the bible created adam 6000 years ago while the earth is already 4.5 billions years old?
is it true that adam was created by God 6000 years ago? i perceived you’re a member of adventist because that is there belief…
for your information adam was not created by God 6000 years ago, try to research about the mayan civilization when was it existed…
Hi, Mr. Russel Lim,
I’m a mathematician, and I disagree.
“To prove yahweh exist there must be an evidence!”
it’s not logically true. if you know little about logic, at least the basic,
it’ll be easier to explain, but I’ll presume you don’t.
To prove that for all cases x is true, showing evidences, by means of experiment, is insufficient.
Proving is not just a matter of evidence or in other words examples.
Can you say that the sum of all interior angles of a triangle is 180 degrees?
The answer is YES, in Euclidean Geom (where parallel lines do not intersect)
but NO, in Elliptic Geom (where all lines intersect). ceteris paribus.
all other postulates are the same.
It’s a matter of basis my dear friend.
Hence, all of this questions doesn’t matter at all,
“But what is the evidence?
why soriano’s god is true and not the god of other religion? what is the evidence of the god of soriano?
why not allah? why not the god of iglesia ni cristo? why not YHW the god of the midianites? why YHWH of soriano?”
If you really want to know, read on.
Read with an open heart.
When I first heard evolution. It really sounded stupid, up until now after further studies, it doesn’t add up.
If even one can show me that it all adds up. I will join you in your quest for knowledge, but I’m pretty sure that won’t happen. Simply because there are full of illogical hypothesis.
Even after the assumption of your hypothesis being true, the probability is insignificant. Ask a statistician. and if by chance, life existed. It won’t be as perfect as now, for the probability of perfection after existence of life is exponentially lower.
Remove those things they’ve got from their dreams or delusions, and all other things that follow, called ‘theories’, supported by those hypothesis are no good as well. There are believable things in Biology, but conveniently, they are all in the bible. even before scientist have ‘discovered’ it.
If you want to prove that what we believe in is not true, show us that the bible is unreliable.
You have shown arrogance, a red light in acquiring knowledge and wisdom.
Magpakumbaba. Pilipino ka naman tingin ko. I’ve seen in myself how arrogant fellow fall.
May God guide you in your search for wisdom.
Ingatan nawa.
P.S. You were posting questions, so I presume, you’re seeking wisdom.
Mawalang galang po.. Di naman ako isang kagalang-galang na tao kasi highschool grad nga lang.. hehehe! I can’t find arrogance sa mga sinabi ni Mr. Lim..
“But what is the evidence?
why soriano’s god is true and not the god of other religion? what is the evidence of the god of soriano?
why not allah? why not the god of iglesia ni cristo? why not YHW the god of the midianites? why YHWH of soriano?”
All of that are just questions.. All of us here are seeking answers.. I really believe that sometimes questions are more powerful than the answers… If you say that all that questions are just showing arrogance, why can’t you try to answer just one of them?
Yes, I’m a christian and I often read the Bible.. Alam mo ba kung ano ang di ko malilimutang phrase?
Ito po yun >>>>>>>> “GOD KNOWS EVERYTHING”.. I respect all religions that exists in this world… And you know what I did? I prayed for the Gods and Goddesses to answer my questions.. I dare them to answer me face to face… Of course they know everything.. I’m not losing hope that that time will come..
Sana masagot nila ako…as long as I’m alive… heheehehhe! ^_^
God Bless You All! And WORLD PEACE!!! 🙂
And this is what happens when a mathematician tries to preach biology. ::sigh::
You seem to know everything. You are so smart! You are smarter than an average APE! So what now? Are you the missing link? Who said that bible said that is 6000 years ago? Where did you get your understanding?
“We cannot find any living creature which is one and a half, two, and two and a half celled plants and animals.”
“If Protozoan and amoeba have evolved into multi-cellular organism due to natural selection and the principle of “survival of the fittest and the elimination of the unfit”, why cannot our human cells product of such evolution, exist independently like protozoan?
W0W , these are great arguments demonstrating falsehood on the allegations of the evolutionist that complex forms of life came from the most simple single-celled plants and animals.
No. No, they are not. A single-celled organism is self sufficient in the sense that its one cell is capable of supporting itself. When the need for larger, more specialized and complex lifeforms arose, individual cells adopted the tendency to support their colony rather than focus on self-sufficiency. The cells that our bodies produce are programmed by our dna to have a set of special jobs to do in order for the whole network of cells to function properly…there was never a NEED for such components to be self sufficient or independent, so as of now they are unable to do so.
Amen. To God be the Glory!
Bro. Eli,
I am amazed with you’re eloquence and you always deliver you’re speeches with conviction unparalleled by any other evangelists. However, I am clearly objecting with the basis of your argument. If you may allow me to restate your arguments, they all summarizes to one point: If evolution is true, then, Bacteria and Protozoans SHOULD have become multicellular already given the course of its existence.
While in the surface level we could easily assure ourselves with your flow of argument, but by assuming yours would be dangerous because the argument is missing a vital point, that is, the Ecological Niche. In layman’s term, Ecological Niche simply means a specific place or role that an organism takes in the ecology. For example, bacteria’s niche are for decomposition or degradation of organic stuffs. I hope you understand this.
The importance of Ecological Niche in the evolution is that it precedes the argument for what we call Speciation. Organisms speciates because they tend to find there ecological niche. That’s why protozoans and bacterias remain single celled because on that form they survive.
The glaring fact that Bro. Eli did not even have to mention a reliable scientific information (in saying this I imply that while others tout the Darwin’s Theory of Evolution to be scientific, common logic says otherwise) but just strong arguments as to why the Evolution theory should not be believed, caused most of us to feel that a simple point has been edified, compels me to say that he would be far irrefutable if he is a Scientist himself.
It doesn’t need a “trying hard scientific mind” to conclude that “Speciation” does not make any aota of a sense. Birds, especially those who dive close enough to water to catch surface fishes would always want to have something to eat so they don’t have to spend much energy flying. Applying the goal of the absurd principle of “Speciation”, do these birds not want to become part fishes, too, for them to easily prey on others? Why did they stay as birds when they could survive better by becoming fishes themselves?
Don’t let your scarce knowledge take you to a place where you don’t want to be. Know God and fear Him. Your life is not yours to keep.
May God Bless you Mr. Lopez.
excellent!!!
May the Peace and Truth of the almighty be always upon all of us in this blog. With the increase of knowledge as prophesied in the bible, it is but natural that there are people like russel lim and others who subscribe to the Theory of evolution, which up to this time is still a theory. We will never find proof or a minute of evidence because the theory is not true. I have had the chance to finish my degrees in the field of engineering, a masters degree, and many other local and international studies, yet at my adult age, I have yet to find an evidence that human evolved from the apes.
The truth is, the bible has all the answers to many questions man will ask. All we have to do is listen to Bro Eli and Bro Daniel, and with a clear and clean heart, God will show us the answers, especially how life started (MARK 4:11).
For the doubting Thomases, follow this blog, and better still spare time to listen to Bro Eli.
To prove evolution really happened there must be a link! But what is the “missing link”? The link that evolutionists must explain scientifically beyond the shadow of a doubt. This link must not be the link being sought for by most evolutionists.
The amount of evidence that we have in regards to the evolution of humans is not only overwhelming, but it is also readily accessible. There is no such thing as a “missing link,” there are many links that connect all currently existing organisms with their respective predecessors and if you go far enough back, we can trace almost all of these lineages to a common ancestor.
Darwin called this issue “…the most obvious and gravest objection which can be urged against my theory…” and attributed the perceived lack of transitional fossils to imperfections in the geologic record.
Each time we discover a new transitional fossil (lets call it “TF”) from “Example A” to “Example B” the demand for more “missing links” is established, because the Creationist will then demand two more links between “Example A” —> “TF” and “TF” —-> “Example B” creating a frivolous endeavor.
It is not a “missing” link. It is not missing because it never existed in the first place.
Excellent post Bro Eli.
To God be the Glory.
There is really no link between humans and apes. We were created by God as humans and will stay as humans.
Every creature was created as what they are right now, some species extinct and God can create new species. From now on, I don’t believe evolution anymore.
So, the begginings of life and evolution; yes, it’s hard and unlikely. So what? So’s the lottery.
But eventually, somebody wins (and how come the majority of lottery winners aren’t churches? Since God provides (yet, for some reason,
Brotha EliGOD needs money!!!), shouldn’t Pope Ratzinger make regular trips to the Elohim Mini-Mart?).So, basically, between this happly replicating little pod of reborn stardust, and us, who’re also stardust (isn’t that awesome? The stuff that makes us used to be brilliant light~) EVERY life form is a transitional species for whatever’s next in line for that branching lineage.
So there’s a few holes? So what? Plenty is filled in, enough to see the line— or are you the kind of retarded shmuck who, on the freeway, drives like they’re trying to wrap their rectum around the steering wheel? There’s gaps in the lane lines, so do you denoucne them? Do you belive there is only the dashes immediatley under your car, so that ahead and behind, the lines don’t exist? Do you preach that one guy named George made all the roads last week, and he’s going to blow them all up tomorrow?
No, you don’t, because that’d be stupid.
None of what this person said made sense, a pure waste of my time. While the blog illustrated an ingenious line up of valid arguments, his (~X~) were all rants that sounded like he woke up at the wrong side of the bed.
What this guy ~X~ did was to challenge Manny Pacquiao in the person of Bro. Eli Soriano with his make faces, as if a child who cannot fight, reason-for-reason, a scholarly mind.
beware of eli soriano.. he’s not a biblical scholar, he’s just a pastor.. here are some of the things scholars admit that pastors like soriano are not aware of:
1. the 4 gospels(mark,matthew,luke and john) were written some 40 years after jesus’ death, it contradicts the fundamentalists claim that mark,matthew.luke and john were the original writers because in fact it is anonymously written in greek(not aramaic-the language of jesus and his apostles) the titles they bear were attributed only by the early catholic church(proto-othodox) in the 2nd century to give them authority as if they were written by the apostles and their companions.
2. Not only do we not have the originals, we don’t have the first copies of the originals. We don’t even have copies of the copies of the originals, or copies of the copies of the copies of the originals. What we have are copies made later—much later. In most instances, they are copies made many centuries later. And these copies all differ from one another, in many thousands of places. As we will see later in this book, these copies differ from one another in so many places that we don’t even know how many differences there are. Possibly it is easiest to put it in comparative terms: there are more differences among our manuscripts than there are words in the New Testament. – Bart Ehrman, Misquoting Jesus
to aliester
beware also of what you are talking about..
So What is your problem? Are you affected in a way that you think you are credible enough to speak about bro.eli? Do you know him that well? Can you support what you’re saying? Why should I listen to you? Who are you? If you think you’re right. Then don’t hide, do something that will open the eyes of the people you want to help. And hoping you’re really care.
Are YOU aware ENOUGH of what you’re saying? You better attend Bible Indoctrinations or Bible Expositions to see what the truth is. People easily judge and criticize Bro. Eli not knowing his true identity. I’m proud to say that I had opened my eyes to what is right and accepted the glory as is. Bro. Eli is helping people to change, change for the better, to do good, avoid the things we shouldn’t do, to expose ourselves more about the teachings in the bible, to have total awareness around us and most especially to be with God. Thanks to Bro. Eli for enlightening me. So I encourage you to open your void eyes and embrace the real truth. The end is near….
Hi Aliester,
It’s because the copies of the copies of the copies of the originals could not, speaking materially, withstand the oxidation process, where everything material expires after some time, and this may mean just a couple of years, decades or centuries even. I bet your compact discs may not even last long enough to be used while you live (and surprisingly, many call this “Technology”..laughing stock).
Is there a way to prove that your parent’s parent’s parent’s parent’s parent’s parent’s…are humans? Or, are you?
I marvel when people who say they are scholars and intelligent miss the most fundamental principles of things most basic.
I end by quoting Bro. Eli in one of his Bible Expositions: “Common sense is NOT so common after all.”
aliester you know what is bible? Be careful if u want a ever lasting life
They are always looking for their missing link, yet none have been found. And none will be found, because there none to be found. No one can find something that God didn’t create. Because from the start evolution is clearly just a speculation.
Ecclesiastes 3:14 (King James Version)
I know that, whatsoever God doeth, it shall be for ever: nothing can be put to it, nor any thing taken from it: and God doeth it, that men should fear before him.
can i ask you first what is your understanding about the so called missing link???? it was proposed in 1861 just 2 yrs after the the book of darwin was published that there is a missing link.. but from 1861 up to now scietists have recovered hundreds of transistional fossils of human(not just one nor the so called missing link for what we have now are thousands of missing links and still none of them are satisfying for a fundamentalists like you) supporting evolution and not a single discovery in science since 1859 have disconfirmed evolution all of them favored and verified the study of darwin.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_human_evolution_fossils
(not just one nor the so called missing link for what we have now are thousands of missing links and still none of them are satisfying for a fundamentalists like you)
thousand of missing link???? If it is found why call it missing link? It haven’t been found because it isn’t existing, if it is found why still look for it. Satisfaction??? They are not satisfied on what they found that is why they are still looking, then why should I be satisfied with your findings. You people say that God doesn’t exist that is why you don’t believe in God. Your missing link doesn’t exist why should I believe or you believe.
Hey Bambi,
Let’s just rest this case. I have to tell you one thing..and this is our secret..aliester is the missing link..
He just could not get to the point, because he’s a Hypocrite..He is a supporter of Darwin who also does not believe that Someone so powerful is capable of creating species, known and unknown, and restoring life in them.
“The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. Corrupt are they, and have done abominable iniquity: there is none that doeth good.”
Psalm 53:1
I rather believe in REALITY than truth, because TRUTH has so many faces. Mr. Soriano is definitely telling us about the TRUTH, so let him speak of it. Religious TRUTHS help control the natural savageness of billions of Homo sapiens living on earth right now. They made this world the best and the worst place, and continue in doing so unless we humans gain enough consciousness about the REALITY.
“God is simply a tool to control ordinary humans, it is time that we let ourselves evolve into gods”
Big Bang Theory:”How did this explosion cause order, while every explosion observed in recorded history causes disorder and disarray?
“Kalokohan ang big bang theory……..
Foolish people believes in foolishness. But the fact still remain that the missing link is not existing!!!
Thanks God Bro. Eli… to God be the Glory…
vgg767 – “I rather believe in REALITY than truth”… I pity you . . . Clearly you do not understand what is the difference between REALITY and TRUTH. Do you believe you have brain inside your skull? Yes? No. Have you seen it already? Yes? NO again.. why ? The REALITY here is that you have to show me that you have brain….. open your head and show it to me…. But the TRUTH is you really have brain…. but you are not using it …. peace…
I agree. vgg767, you are not using it. You’re convinced that its the truth and yet you doesn’t want to believe it.
Do you think Science is reality? Not all. since…
Science is Politics. If most scientists agree, then it is true.
That’s how it is when it comes to science.
Reality is in the System of Truth, not just any truth (the other faces you are talking about), but the Truth the bible states or specifically, the System of Truth in line with the words of God in the Bible.
The science taught in school is tinted with inconsistencies.
Study the science in the Bible, and you’ll see a consistent science.
Why waste your time, if you have found Bro. Eli, who can explain all things using the bible as the only basis?
It’ll be a lot easier than studying the bible on your own.
Use it, and it’s even more convenient if you would ask for Bro. Eli’s help.
to gnoppix..
you’re absolutely correct.. nice..
vgg767 smells like a Moron..Ooppss..a Mormon.
I highly recommend that for those who deny the fact that evolution occurs through the mechanism of natural selection (along with other NATURAL mechanisms) do a little research on the subject before sticking your fingers in your ears and spewing “It’s not true…etc., etc.”
I would also suggest that you also do some research on the meaning of the word “theory” and the meaning of the word “theory” as it is used in the term “scientific theory.” There’s a big difference there!
Oh and btw…gravity is also a scientific theory, but I don’t hear anyone challenging the physics behind air transportation.
to eli boy’s followers.. why do we have 4gospels? who ratified that there would be 27 books in the new testament? who wrote first? paul or the gospel writers? which gospel was written first, the last? what do you know about the history of the new testament, do you have a team who participate in archeological dig of manuscripts and do you have an authority to study and analyze those manuscripts written in greek, coptics etc? whats the result of your study? eli boy only reads and analyze the printed bible we all familiar today.. he’s not aware on how the early copyists of the manuscripts corrupted the stories in the early 2nd centuries. here is an example of textual criticism from a biblical scholar Bruce Metzger.. give us the thoughts of eli boy based on the early manuscripts not on the printed bible (remember the printed english bible KJV,NIV etc etc are just based on manuscripts written originally in greek, coptic, syriac, as categoreized by family of letters byzantine or alexandrian etc..)
The Gospel According To Mark
1.1 Cristou/ @ui`ou/ qeou/# {C}
The absence of ui`ou/ qeou/ in a* Q 28C al may be due to an oversight in copying, occasioned by the similarity of the endings of the nomina sacra. On the other hand, however, there was always a temptation (to which copyists often succumbed)1 to expand titles and quasi-titles of books. Since the combination of B D W al in support of ui`ou/ qeou/ is extremely strong, it was not thought advisable to omit the words altogether, yet because of the antiquity of the shorter reading and the possibility of scribal expansion, it was decided to enclose the words within square brackets.
1.2 evn tw|/ VHsai<a| tw|/ profh,th| {A}
The quotation in verses 2 and 3 is composite, the first part being from Mal 3.1 and the second part from Is 40.3. It is easy to see, therefore, why copyists would have altered the words “in Isaiah the prophet” (a reading found in the earliest representative witnesses of the Alexandrian and the Western types of text) to the more comprehensive introductory formula “in the prophets.”
@ aliester: Better keep our mouth shut when what we plan to assert is uncertain or there is lack of evidence.
“eli boy only reads and analyze the printed bible we all familiar today..” Where did you get this? Have you watched all episodes of Bro. Eli’s Bible expositions and preaching? FYI, Bro. Eli has read the Codex Sinaiticus in UK, a certified manuscript.
We are all aware of the paraphrasing and other “imperfections” done by the so-called Biblical scholars and translators. Bro. Eli has discussed that so many times.
Actually, using simple logic or common sense, you don’t need an authority to dig 100 miles deep just to check again all the manuscripts, some are even unreadable due to damage, excluding those books that are lost but mentioned in the bible. This is a stupid argument.
Old testament has prophecies fulfilled in the New testament. Even if there are mistakes in translation, including deciphering, it will be easy for someone who is gifted to understand the Scriptures, to discern or pinpoint those mistakes. How? There will be contradictions arising between the writings of the various Biblical authors.
Example, if the book of Isaiah is properly translated, and a prophecy from it is to be fulfilled in the book of John, then a contradiction must be found due to wrong translation. But if there is none, translation is correct, including deciphering!
How did Bro. Eli knew that the last few verses of Mark chapter 16 are additions and inventions of scrupulous Bible “scholars”? Because all verses from 9 – 20 are contradicting other Biblical truths. They all speak of false ideas not in conformity with CHRIST’s teachings.
Understanding the Bible is a gift. To see Biblical contradictions only means you are not the one gifted.
And accusing others of what you just think they are without evidences (like believing in evolution) is a very stupid act of a pseudo-scientist.
May the LORD GOD enlighten the darkened minds.
Let us not forget the chromosomes do not add up either. A tobacco plant has two more chromosomes than a human. Will we evolve into a tobacco plant eventually? A fern has 460 chromosomes. Are ferns more evolved than us? Chimpanzees are supposed to be our ancestors. They have the same number of chromosomes as a tobacco plant. How did that happen? Perhaps it is God’s tools for designing what is his to create in the first place.
type of chromosomes not quantity is what matters
@ devon: what you said is absurd, pardon me. Of course, quantity matters. If evolution theory is claiming that life evolved from the simple to the complex, then both type and quantity must be considered.
A puzzle containing 100 pieces is more complex than a puzzle containing just 5 pieces. Considering that evolution implies biological accident, it is comparable to puzzle pieces, and even worse than that, with the element of probability.
May the LORD GOD enlighten your mind.
@Aria Moon
Apparently, Brother Eli is not, in any way, an authority when it comes to genetics, nor science. There are many of loopholes in this article and as backed up by empirical evidences, even an undergraduate Biology student could easily refute every single statement that Bro Eli asserted.
What I find appalling though is that it seems Bro Eli is using Science selectively to back up his arguments. From what I recall from watching some of his “debates” and clips, he uses scientific evidences on his arguments. But why, oh why, does he exclude the evdences backing up evolution?
What were those loopholes? Or, you just believe there are? C’mon, let’s do away with attacking the personality and stick to facts and arguments if you really are a man of evidence..Oh, did evolution presented ever, any reliable evidence for us to believe it?
You sounded like you are a man of reason, someone who believes in God; But how could someone in the same thinking also support something as absurd as the Theory of Evolution? How could you believe in God and not believe him on the same plane?
The undergraduate Biology student does mot make sense.
@ angelo: please cite those “loopholes”.
In your 1st paragraph, you said “There are many loopholes…” and then “…even an undergraduate Biology student could easily refute every single statement that Bro Eli asserted.” So you mean all statements of Bro. Eli are wrong.
1. Is Bro. Eli wrong in this “The discovery of “one unique” evidence placed Britain to be a contender as the cradle of humanity.”? Please think before you post.
2. Also angelo, if Bro. Eli is not an authority in science, are you?
3. Where are your “evidences backing up evolution”? That’s only an imagination of evolutionists. Can you please show here your “best” evidence of evolution? Such evidences don’t exist.
Evidences of mutation and genetics, yes they are facts. But linking them to evolution, it’s ridiculous.
To quote Mr. Dawkins, ” Evolution is only a theory, which implies that, it is in doubt.”
1. The finding of the British missing link contender is NOT TRUE, but that alone does not invalidates the complexity of Evolution. The scientific community rejected that because of its invalidity. Bro Eli’s fault in this is that he zeroed in and out of this claim to build his argument. Seems like he;s manipulating the fact.
2. I am neither an authority in Science. BUT, I am studying molecular biology so I think I understand Evolution in its proper sense. Bro Eli, on the other hand, has no background in this area. He may seem to be well read, but it seems like he already knows what he wants to know and believed what he wants to believe before understanding the whole concept of evolution objectively.
3. I can discuss evolution in an extent limited by current knowledge. And I pity you all people that the only evidence you will ever consider is the missing link itself. I advise you first study the Scientific Process before having the guts to challenge people.
“Evidences of mutation and genetics, yes they are facts. But linking them to evolution, it’s ridiculous.”
It already came from you. THEY ARE FACTS and the facts points out to the complicated intricate relationship of organisms across the diversity of life!
1. You are “championing” your education but you do not know how to answer questions. No one said that the finding ALONE invalidated evolution. Anyway, it seems your answer to my 1st Q is NO. Therefore, you are wrong in your assertion. You have wasted your time in school.
2. No need for a thorough background in evolution to say it is ridiculous. It’s obviously a stupid dream from Darwin. To refute this, you can discuss your “best” evidence of evo. For sure, there’s none.
3. “…limited by current knowledge” – that’s one failure of our known science. Science today is not the science 20 years from now. There’ll be a lot of changes, additions and subtractions. And again, the missing link is not the only evidence we considered. You have poor reading comprehension as I see in how you interpret Bro Eli’s post and mine as well.
The only vivid relationship between organisms is that all other things around are for the benefit of humankind. No need for that “complicated intricate relationship” as it just led pseudo-scientific people to confusion.
May the LORD GOD enlighten us all.
thanks be to God for a wonderful article that proves evolution is not true.. take care always Bro. Eli.
Very well said! 😀
Ok, if you evolutionists insist!
Then you folks are monkeys because your forefathers were monkeys!
As simple as that.
funny … and i agree with your proposition.
as you think … you are.
we who believe we are God’s children … are God’s children.
they who believe otherwise … are otherwise.
may the Light of God continue to shine in our hearts … for us to draw more closer to Him ,.. and those who are God’s children from where they are now.
inorganic matter formed into organic matter
organic matter evolved into protocells
protocells evolved into multicell.
CHEMISTRY.
those inorganic matter came from what? aber? ANSWER!
That is evolution Whitebeard, just like how stones turn into diamonds or cocoons turn into butterflies.
As quoted by Bro. Eli in Ecclesiastes 3:14 “I know that, whatsoever God doeth, it shall be forever: nothing can be put to it, nor any thing taken from it: and God doeth it, that men should fear before him.”
NOTHING CAN BE PUT TO IT, NOR ANYTHING TAKEN FROM IT: AND GOD DOETH IT. In order for your inorganic matter to form into organic matter, no one must not put anything to it, nor anything taken from it: AND GOD DOETH IT to evolve into multicell.
CHEMISTRY AND BIBLICAL.
Irrational human beings trying so hard to be rational. What a sorry state religion has become. LoL. If God does exist then why did he wait 6 days for the world to be created? Why not just a split second? Inconsistent with a Supreme all-powerful big bro in the sky if you ask me. Religion is the provider of comfort for the few and ignorance for the many. Why do you lot do good things? Is it out of fear of hell? Religion doesn’t give room for doubt and that therein makes it a narrow-minded endeavor.