Comments on: From Dust to Man: A Scientific Proof

By: Oxnard

Oxnard — Tue, 10 Jun 2008 23:05:21 +0000

A literalist eh? Sadly, you’re missing so much by reducing the bible to a text book of history or science. It’s a spiritual book whose meaning escapes you. It’s easier for you to believe that Jesus walked on water than it is to understanding the meaning of those words, which can only be revealed to you by God. Much like the Pharisees, you error and teach your erros to others and no one wins the prize.

By: josie

josie — Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:55:46 +0000

Lot of info and knowledge.

Others dont believe,after chopping john the baptist head wants to command Someone to turn water to wine.

Other the one that said go down in the cross and save us still didnt believe.

Others want a logical explanation that can be seen by naked eye, that every material can be seen.

How did the pharoah in egypt know GOD and how they fear GOD?

After all the signs and wonders,unbeliever became believer.

Or in our time whipping of word of GOD will not convinced others,whipping of rod will narrow it down their options when they will going to see the sign,stars falling and others before that.

By: joy

joy — Sat, 24 May 2008 02:36:57 +0000

to: Objectlesson;
Hello.
I can see your point and somehow understand you. You got my attention when you spoke of the “killing in the name of Christ”.
I understand your concern.Now for you to understand my concern,I recommend that you listen to Mr.Soriano talk about the people who believes that in killing they serve god (according to him these people are hypocrites and merely pretending to know God).
Objective Science invented those killing devices,Mister, while God’s people are admonished heavily against killing their fellow.
You have a choice,believe that Christians can’t think objectivelly about the Bible and ignore the obvious connection of Biblical truths (C/o Mr.Soriano) and your objective Science; or throw away your religious prejudices and realize how Science proves that there is God and He made you out of the dust of the Earth.
By the way,can you ask anybody near you what ‘libag’(Tagalog) is and what it is made of/ what it looks like?

By: joy

joy — Sat, 24 May 2008 02:18:21 +0000

to: oxfordstudy,
Mister/Miss/Mrs;
Good day,
I hope that God will favor you with his call,that you may be content enough to thank him and lucky enough to receive his words. I hope you will have open eyes, ears, heart and mind to accept the truth when it slaps you in the face. Do you belong to any religion?what is it,i am curious…

By: Jonathan Millard

Jonathan Millard — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 08:53:05 +0000

“What a load of nonsene. Just because two things have the same ingridients, it doesn’t mean that one caused the other.”

But if two creatures have 99% similar DNA then that means one evolved from the other? Looks like, if you are an evolution-believer, you don’t like your own logic at all because that’s the EXACT argument you are dismissing as utter crap!

At least Christians have another ingredient to their stance, making it an entirely DIFFERENT argument. Namely; the fact that it was written in scripture, said by our GOD, thousands of years before we had the technology to prove it, NOW add in the fact that the elements in the dust God said He formed man out of MATCHES the elements in the human body. That’s a three-point connection, not a two-point.

You see? There’s more than just, “One’s like the other! They are related!” That’s the evolution argument, NOT the Christian one.

By: lyntel

lyntel — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 02:46:07 +0000

The LORD God formed man of the dust of the groud, not God. By the way, the scripture does not say “a” man. It says man. Preachers added the “a”. They say, it was Ad’am and Ad’am was a man.

Genesis 5:1 This is the book of the generations of Ad’am. In the day that God created MAN, in the likeness of God made He him; Male and female created He them; and blessed them, and called THEIR NAME AD’AM. The male and the female were called Ad’am.
Looks like we need a little education on learning how to read a sentence.
Ignorance is a lack of knowledge, education and experience. Many people are ignorant to the word “dust”.
How much knowledge do any of you have to the word”dust”?Have you ever looked the word up?
Dust is anything easily supended through the air. It is worthless, useless and no good for nothing. Dust is no merit. Does this sound like a human body being formed? This is not a body being formed.
Now think about this for a while. What is worthless,useless, no good for nothing and has no merit? Dust is anything easily suspended through the air? I’ll give you timt to figure that one out.

I have a book comming out called Man of Dust. It explains everything.

By: oxfordstudy

oxfordstudy — Tue, 25 Dec 2007 07:54:49 +0000

2 Days ago I posted a comment refuting the “scientific” claims made in this article in a frank and constructive manner.

Apparently my argument was deemed dangerous enough to warrant its removal from the post.

This makes it sound like there’s something to hide.

I assume this post will also be removed, so on this Christmas Day, I would ask for one gift: a renewal of FREE SPEECH.